Don’t Be Coy With a Letter of Intent

January 21, 2008 - Mergers and Acquisitions

I recently worked on a deal where the prospective seller over-strategized the letter of intent. The seller wanted my client to sign a non-binding LOI that contained about half of what should have been included in the letter. It was extremely frustrating and ultimately was a waste of time, because rather than acquiesce to the seller’s demands, my client walked away from the deal.

While the LOI was “non-binding” in every way (and the seller kept repeating that), that wasn’t reason enough for my client to proceed. Basically, my client didn’t want to push forward without knowing more terms. And I can’t blame him. Why start the acquisition process without sufficient knowledge of basic terms?

I assume the seller was either not that serious about selling or is trying to gauge a potential buyer’s interest, but either way you run the risk of alienating potential buyers.

Popularity: 83% [?]

About the Author: Ryan Roberts is a corporate lawyer and advises clients in a wide variety of transactional matters, with an emphasis on startup companies, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate governance. His clients have included companies in the technology, energy, real estate, health care, construction, and retail sectors. Visit his law firm's website.

Comments

Got something to say?